https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:25929 Wed 11 Apr 2018 11:32:42 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51633 Wed 01 May 2024 11:50:26 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54299 Thu 15 Feb 2024 14:53:02 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:36303 80%) for six of the 12 most common cancer types: breast, colorectum, kidney, lung, pancreas and uterus. The available hospital data covered more recent time periods. We have since obtained more recent cancer registry data, allowing us to further test the validity of hospital diagnosis records in identifying incident cases. Results: The more recent hospital diagnosis data were valid for identifying incident cases for the six cancer types, with sensitivities 81-94% and PPVs 86-96%. However, 2-10% of cases were identified >3 months after the registry's diagnosis date and detailed clinical cancer information was unavailable. The level of identification was generally higher for cases aged <80 years, those with known disease stage and cases living in higher socioeconomic areas. The inclusion of death records increased sensitivity for some cancer types, but requires caution due to potential false-positive cases. This study validates the use of hospital diagnosis records for identifying incident cancer cases.]]> Thu 13 Jan 2022 10:28:05 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49169 Fri 05 May 2023 15:37:21 AEST ]]>